I think one should ask one's self why the performance guys claim such huge differences when they put on slightly thicker swaybars, but the lifted guys claim no difference when they take them off. Then consider that the lifted guys have more flex, and more potential sway..... Then putting it all together, you realize that it is all a crock of faeces.
I don't understand it. From a physics point of view, it is impossible that no swaybays make no difference. From a personal experience point of view, having run with no front swaybar and/or no rear sway bar at 4 & 6 inches of lift on my WJ, the difference was astronomical. So what is going on here? Mass deception? Illusion? BS? What is it? Too young and inexperienced? I have 75 thousand miles on my WJ, and it has been lifted for 40 thousand of those. I definitely have a lot of experience in all situations, and for a lifted WJ with and without swaybars, front and rear, I can easily make the claim that swaybars FRONT and REAR are necessary for a safe vehicle.... safe for you, your family, and certainly safer for the other occupants on the road. Maybe they are not necessary when you are driving straight down the road, but all you have to do is avoid one pothole, one dog, one stalled vehicle, and it could be curtains for you.
Offroad of course, front swaybars suck, and rear swaybars.... depends on how tippy you are. The rear doesn't seem to affect capability too much (I personally was flexing too much with them off), and the fronts.... that is why you have disconnects.