|
|
|||||||
| Home | Forum | Register | Photo Gallery | Donate | Members List | Advertise | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Auto Escrow | Auto Loans |
| View Poll Results: Stock 195 thermostat vs. 180 thermostat. | |||
| Stock 195 |
|
10 | 37.04% |
| After Market 180 |
|
17 | 62.96% |
| Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Senior Member
Grand Addict
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Barrington, IL
Posts: 801
|
Thought I'd post a fresh question on this subject.
Stock 195 thermostat vs. 180 thermostat. You see my intake body gasket is leaking so I'm tempted to put a 180 in, but the open/closed cycle argument has got me on the fence.
__________________
2000 WJ - not stock. "The only bad ideas are ones that are poorly executed." Tom (thats me) |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |||
Advertisement | |||
|
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Grand Master
|
I put in a 180* and haven't looked back.
__________________
1993 Jeep ZJ V8 5.2 HP44/9", 4.88's, Full Spools, Clayton's, ALL IN PROGRESS LINK TO MY PAGE |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Senior Member
Grand Addict
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 526
|
I got a 180* wish I could have found a 160*
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Grand Master
|
A 180* is great because it isn't too extreme and still allows the grand to reach operating temperature and run within normal range. The thing that is always said with the lower degree thermostats is that it fools the computer. By the thermostat opening sooner and keeping the engine cooler it makes the computer think that the engine isn't getting up to operating temperature around the midway mark on the temperature gauge. To compensate and create more heat the engine dumps more fuel creating more power in the cylinder. I've noticed this idea in the fact that most of the cars and Jeeps i've owned are more "ballsy" in the morning when its colder. This is all the theory behind it.
I think the 180* makes my 5.2L run at the perfect temperature even in the hot days of summer. I don't think dropping to a 160* would be much more beneficial.
__________________
1993 Grand Cherokee Limited- 7" long arm lifted, SOLD 1999 Grand Cherokee Laredo- 3" Kevin's lift and 31" Goodyears on JK Moabs |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Grand Master
|
run the 195 in the winter, and the 180 in the summer, you will have less problems with overheating on the trail.
__________________
2000 WJ with Kevins Roof Rack bone stock |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Senior Member
Grand Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Prague,Czech rep., EU
Posts: 151
|
A 180°F t-stat [smilie=bal_cool.gif]
__________________
Jeep Grand Cherokee ZJ Ltd. LX 5,9 V8,K&N FIPK,Thorley headers,Flowmaster50SUV, ACOS lift,adj.track bar,RanchoRS9000X w/remote, 30"BFG A/T,180°F t-stat,Accel coil+cables. NP242,trans+steering cooler. www.properform.cz properform@seznam.cz |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Senior Member
Grand Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Liverpool, NY (Syracuse)
Posts: 462
|
I like the 195 for winter and the 180 for the summer idea myself. But remember that a cooler thermostat does nothing except drop you operating temp. If you are running hot, then you need to address this at the source be it air flow, water flow or radiating capacity.
In terms of extra power, cooler air, and therefore cooler manifolds equals denser air and better power too. Last summer we talked about this a lot. In good health the stock set-up will usually do a great job at least for 4.0's and 5.2's. I have found on these the stock Mopar thermostat does a great job, better than a 195 aftermarket. My 5.2 barely moves it's needle a half a marking be it cold winter or hot summer. Somebody at engineer did a lot of homework and testing on these rigs and set ups. Never owning a 5.9 I can not comment on those. But as things start to age out that is another story.
__________________
'98, 5.2 28Z Package ZJ, Kevin's Rad Support '98 ZJ 5.2 LTD (New!!!) '00, 4.0 26F Package WJ '83 258 SJ Cherokee, SOLD '72 318 Dodge Dart |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Senior Member
Grand Addict
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Barrington, IL
Posts: 801
|
Is there really a difference once the Jeep warms up? I leaning towards a stock T-stat even though popular opinion is pointing the other way.
Logically doesn't the 180 only delay the warm up? Once the t-stat opens up you introduce the cooler stored fluid in the radiator to the system. Then that heats up so the entire loop is keeping the engine at about 210.
__________________
2000 WJ - not stock. "The only bad ideas are ones that are poorly executed." Tom (thats me) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Senior Member
Grand Master
|
There are certain temperatures at which the thermostat is partially opened and fully opened. If the thermostat fully opens at 180* then it allows the coolant to start working quicker to keep the engine temperature down. If the temp is already up around 210* and then the thermostat finally opens fully its now playing catch up to keep the engine block from overheating. I like the 180* being ahead of the game. Before I installed mine, I had to watch the needle climb past the halfway mark before it would finally start to come back down. Now it never gets up near it.
__________________
1993 Grand Cherokee Limited- 7" long arm lifted, SOLD 1999 Grand Cherokee Laredo- 3" Kevin's lift and 31" Goodyears on JK Moabs |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Senior Member
Grand Junkie
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 123
|
I had a 160 in mine for about 6 months. ZJ's with 5.2's run rich from the factory as it is, with the 160 even moreso to the point where you start seeing even less mileage than usual (I know hard to believe). When I switched back to the 192-195 I gained about a mile and a half per gallon, back up to a whopping 12.7 :mrgreen:
__________________
'97 Orvis, silver, not green, 318, 170,000 miles, stock enough to look stock. |
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links | |
Advertisement | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|